Mary Doria Russell
Completed 10/15/2013, Reviewed 11/5/2013
Despite being an agnostic, I love SF and Fantasy that questions, critiques, or parodies religion. Some of my favorite novels are “Canticle for Leibowitz,” Case ofConscience, and “Live from
Golgotha” by Gore
Vidal. So when I looked for more books
to read for the WOGF challenge, I searched in the WWEnd database using the tag
“theological.” Once again, I found a
“The Sparrow” transposes the experience of the New World Jesuit missions to the genre of SF. Fr. Emilio Sandoz, a Jesuit priest leads the first mission to a planet which seems to harbor intelligent life. Something goes terribly wrong and leaves the priest the only survivor, demoralized and in a crisis of faith.
The premise of “The Sparrow” may seem absurd by today’s standards. We don’t expect the Catholic Church to be the first to send a mission to an extraterrestrial world. Placed in a historical context, it is not absurd at all. This happened throughout the European exploration of the
as well as the non-Christianized regions of the other continents. This book takes that premise and places is in
a contemporary context with our modern sense of cultural sensitivity. The result provides the reader with a group
of very likable, honorable, and by most definitions, good people put into a morally
ambiguous and deadly situation.
I loved the prose of the book. It was beautifully written. I found the narrative structure to be quite compelling. The history of the mission is told parallel to the trials of the surviving Fr Sandoz. It is another book where every word seems important and every paragraph necessary.
I also loved the characterizations. The people on the mission were drawn in such detail and with such love, that I could relate them to specific people I knew from my college days when I hung out with a group of left-wing radicals which spanned the spectrum from radical nuns to philosophical scientists. During the ‘80s, all these people came together to form an intentional community of support for each other and care for their fellow human beings in a spirit of peace and justice. I read several reviews of the book that insisted that these characters were too good to be true. My experience is that these people exist, and find each other and God in the world in profound ways.
What would it be like if there were more than one sentient species on a planet? There must be some novels that have speculated on this concept, but this is my first encounter with it. Uplift stories don’t even come close. Russell takes the premise of multiple sentient species interacting on a planet and forces us into a moral quandary. How will we interact with extraterrestrial life where evolution has created a morality so radically different than ours? The answer may be difficult and even abhorrent, but it is a question we will probably have to face.
Despite my absolute love of this book, I had a few issues with it. It saddened me that Russell’s Church of the future is still run by celibate males, and that there is no feminine influence at the highest levels. I also found it disheartening that the one gay character only came out to one other character. The way he came out reminded me of a quote by Montgomery McNeil in the movie “Fame,” “Never being happy isn’t the same as being unhappy. Is it?”
Russell uses a lot of archetypes and common Catholic iconography in the formation of her main characters. Fr Sandoz is the saint of classic hagiography. He is a sinner who has a conversion experience and goes out to live the gospel. In the tradition of the mystic saints, and as the main plot of the book, he experiences an existential crisis in a dark night of the soul. Fr Yarbrough can be likened to St Peter, the rock, the commander and pragmatist of the mission, carrying his rifle like Peter carrying his sword at the
. The two women on the mission, Anne and Sofia,
fit snuggly into the archetypes of the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene,
respectively. Anne, while not being a
virgin, is childless. She admittedly
becomes the mother to the members of the mission. Garden of Gethsemane
The big reveal at the end feeds into the existential dilemma of Fr Sandoz: if God exists, then how can evil be God’s will? If God doesn’t exist, then isn’t this deplorable situation the fruit of my own choices? Both questions lead to despair and hopelessness. It reminds me of the commonly thrown-about phrase, “The path to hell is paved with good intentions.” How do we discern which good intentions do not lead to hell? Even if we think we have a well-formed conscience and believe we are doing God’s will, we may still be making the wrong decisions.
I made the mistake of reading a lot of reader reviews of this book, and had to hold myself from speaking to a lot of the criticisms. One or two slipped out anyway. I think the amount of criticism signifies that the book accomplished its goal: to create a dialogue about the nature of moral ambiguity in a beautifully written piece of science fiction.
This is a five-star book. This is also the longest review I’ve ever written. “The Sparrow” evoked a lot of feelings and ideas. Clearly, I had some issues with it, but ultimately, I loved it. I think great literature asks profound questions and leaves us with ambiguity. The pursuit of the answers is beautifully summarized in this quote, “If we keep demanding that God yield up His answers, perhaps some day we will understand them. And then we will be something more than clever apes, and we shall dance with God.”