Sunday, July 5, 2020


Hal Duncan
Completed 7/5/2020, Reviewed 7/5/2020
3 stars

I literally don’t know what I just read.  It’s beautiful, but nearly indecipherable.  The prose is magnificent, almost poetic, with occasional alliteration as well as run on sentences that make internal sense.  It has many story lines, including at least one that is meta.  What it doesn’t have is a discernable plot.  The story line is non-linear, jumping between past, ancient past, future, and present.  If it weren’t for the book’s description on jacket flap, I would have never known what it was supposed to be about.  Reading it was a cross between joy and penance.  I’ve read lots of reviews of the book, and they are all over the place.  Many people love it, many people hate it.  Enough people gave it love to get several awards nominations, winning the Gaylactic Spectrum Award for 2007.   I would not have been so generous.  That probably means I wouldn’t like James Joyce’s “Ulysses” if I were ever to attempt that novel.

So the Vellum is the fabric of everything and somewhere in it was lost The Book of All Hours.  It is a book that supposedly contains the accounting of every being that’s ever existed.  It is effectively the work of God.  It is sought after by angels and demons who walk the earth and are at battle with each other.  They used to be human.  Now they are unkin.  The story more or less follows several unkin.  Some used to be ancient gods, somehow became human, then became unkin.  A lot of time is spent with Seamus Fannin, an unkin who does not take a side in the battle, and Phreedom Messanger, who once was a Sumerian goddess, and her brother Tommy.  There are some gay characters who seem to part of the meta-story, but also appear within other story lines.  There is a prologue that introduces us to several characters who find the book and an epilogue that seems to be about some people after the battle. 

At this point in my reviews, I usually launch into character development, but this time I can’t.  It’s difficult to describe any one character, but I can tell you what I’ve gleaned.  As I said in the plot, we do spend a lot of time with Seamus, who doesn’t take sides in the war between angels and demons.  He, like Phreedom, existed in ancient times.  He also fought in WWI and in the Spanish Civil War.  He also exists in the book’s present, 2017, which is actually the tens year after the publish date, so it’s actually the future.  He says fooking a lot, is ornery, and gets into a lot of trouble throughout his long life.  He goes on long soliloquies that are amazing to read.  Phreedom was interesting as the Sumerian queen and goddess Inanna.  In the present, she’s a biker chick trying to find her brother Tommy.  He appears several times in the book and was also the brother of Inanna.  He’s also known as Puck, Tamuz, and Matthew Shepard, the gay young man who was murdered in Wyoming about twenty-five years ago.

There’s one character, Jack, who I think is an angel.  And I think he was in the prologue, and maybe in the epilogue.  It was hard to tell if they were different Jacks or the same person.  He went by the name Jack Carter and Jack Flash, as in Jumpin’.  We spend a lot of time with him, but I never figured him out.  I did get that he was in love with Tommy.

The who mixing of timelines was immensely confusing.  As one reviewer said, it’s like the author wrote out multiple stories on index cards, shuffled them, that was what was published.  The way I resigned myself to reading the book was to just take every paragraph as an independent thought.  If it continued the thought from the previous paragraph, great.  If I was able to relate it to someone or something I already read, great.  If I couldn’t figure out where it belonged or why it was even brought up, I just enjoyed the prose and continued on.  It’s not a great way to read a book, but it got me through it.

Why then would I give the book three stars out of five?  Normally, three stars means good.  Was this book good?  I can’t say, but neither can I say that the book was excellent or terrible.  It was just very hard to read when I was looking for coherency.  Once I gave up, it became like poetry; I can marvel at the form and the effort, but I don’t get it.  Three stars seems like a decent compromise.  This book is the first of a duology.  The second book is “Ink”, but I just don’t think I want to make the effort to get through that book as well. 

No comments:

Post a Comment